The grade tier. Enough to get an honest answer fast.
- [✓]Letter grades for every peptide × outcome
- [✓]Quick-take summaries
- [✓]Regulatory status and safety flags
- [✓]Weekly newsletter (Tue, no promotions)
An independent, evidence-graded reference for every peptide in the scientific literature. Letter grades for each peptide × outcome, every claim linked to its source paper. No supplement sales. No industry funding.
Peptides graded
87
Studies indexed
1,240+
Outcomes graded
312
Industry dollars
$0
PEPTIDE_NAME
GLP-1 receptor agonist
// OUTCOME: TYPE 2 DIABETES
Phase 3 trials showed a 14.9% mean weight loss at 68 weeks — vs 2.4% on placebo.
SUB-SCORES
Studies
312
Outcomes
9
Yrs post-mkt
8+
§ 01.00
BROWSE_BY_USE
87 peptides organized across 8 therapeutic categories. The grade badge shows the strongest-evidence peptide in each category.
GLP-1 family, amylin agonists, incretin combinations for diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome.
Tissue repair, tendon healing, gut integrity, post-injury peptides. Predominantly preclinical; no A-grade human trial.
GH secretagogues and IGF modulators for body composition, sleep, aging biomarkers.
Peptides claimed to extend healthspan or lifespan. Most evidence is animal-only or single-lab.
Melanocortin agonists and PT-family peptides for sexual desire and dysfunction.
Thymic and antimicrobial peptides for immune modulation, viral infection, post-infection recovery.
Nootropic peptides for memory, anxiety, focus, neuroprotection — primarily Russian literature.
Topical and injectable peptides for collagen synthesis, pigmentation, hair growth. Mostly cosmetic-grade data.
§ 02.00
THE_METHOD
Each peptide receives an evidence grade for every outcome it has been studied for — not a single blanket score. BPC-157 grades C for tendon healing and C for IBD on different evidence bases. We grade the evidence, not the molecule.
Strong
Multiple high-quality human RCTs converge. Mechanism understood. Long-term safety data exists. Effect clearly exceeds placebo.
Promising
At least one well-powered human trial showing benefit. Mechanism plausible. Limited long-term data.
Mixed
Conflicting human results, small samples, or strong animal data without human confirmation.
Weak
Animal-only or anecdotal evidence. Mechanism speculative. No meaningful human data.
Unsafe / Disproven
Human data shows no effect, harm, or unacceptable risk. Or banned by major regulatory body.
01
Mechanism understood
02
Human studies (count + quality)
03
Effect vs placebo
04
Long-term safety data
05
Side effect profile
06
Regulatory status
§ 03.00
FEATURED_THIS_EDITION
GLP-1 receptor agonist
OUTCOME: TYPE 2 DIABETES
Multiple high-powered RCTs converge, mechanism is well-understood, FDA-approved, long-term safety data out to 4+ years.
Studies
312
Outcomes
9
Yrs post-mkt
8+
Dual GIP / GLP-1 agonist
OUTCOME: OBESITY
Well-powered Phase 3 program, dual receptor mechanism characterized, FDA-approved with active surveillance.
Studies
198
Outcomes
7
Effect
Δ20.9%
Body protective compound 157
OUTCOME: TENDON HEALING
Animal evidence is consistent, but human evidence is limited to three uncontrolled pilots (~26 subjects total).
Studies
154
Outcomes
7
Human RCTs
0
Copper tripeptide-1
OUTCOME: WOUND HEALING
Mechanism partially understood, topical evidence is decent, but injectable claims outrun the data.
Studies
87
Outcomes
5
Topical RCTs
9
§ 04.00
RESEARCH_FEED
150+ studies summarized monthly. Members get the full breakdown, methodology critique, and effect-size context.
Retatrutide
Obesity
At 48 weeks, 12 mg dose produced a mean placebo-adjusted body weight reduction of 22.1%. Effect appears to plateau at 36 weeks in the high-dose arm.
NEJM · n=338BPC-157
Achilles tendinopathy
Subcutaneous BPC-157 (250 mcg BID, 4 weeks) reduced VISA-A pain scores vs baseline. No control arm. Findings hypothesis-generating only.
J Sports Med (preprint) · n=22Cagrilintide + semaglutide
Weight loss
Combination outperformed semaglutide monotherapy by 5.3 percentage points in mean weight loss at 68 weeks, comparable GI side-effect profile.
Lancet · n=1247Epitalon
Lifespan extension
No human RCTs identified. Animal lifespan data limited to single-lab Russian-language publications, with methodological concerns and no replication.
Ageing Res Rev§ 05.00
EDITORIAL_STANDARDS
Not aspirations. The test we apply to every page before it ships.
No supplement sales. No industry sponsorships. No affiliate revenue from peptide vendors. Funding is membership only.
Every claim links to a primary source by DOI or PubMed ID. If we can't cite it, we don't claim it.
Every peptide page includes a required "What we don't know yet" section. Absence of evidence is information.
Grades attach to peptide × outcome pairs. A molecule can be A for one use and D for another.
One dispatch every Tuesday. No promotions, no affiliate links.
§ 06.00
COMMON_QUESTIONS
A peptide is a short chain of amino acids — the same building blocks that make up proteins, just in a smaller sequence (typically 2 to 50 amino acids). Many peptides are signaling molecules the body produces naturally; others are synthetic analogs designed to mimic, block, or modify those signals.
Each peptide is graded against six weighted sub-scores for every outcome: mechanism understood, count and quality of human studies, effect vs placebo, long-term safety data, side effect profile, regulatory status. Sub-scores roll up into a letter grade A–F.
Independence. The moment a publication sells what it reviews, every grade becomes suspect. Peptigrade is funded by member subscriptions and institutional licenses — no supplement sales, no sponsorships, no affiliate revenue.
It depends on the peptide and the jurisdiction. Some are FDA-approved drugs. Some are sold legally for research use only. Some are banned in competitive sports by WADA. Each peptide page includes its current regulatory status.
Because the evidence is different for each use. BPC-157 has strong animal evidence for tendon healing but no randomized human trial — that earns a C. Semaglutide has ten Phase 3 RCTs for type 2 diabetes — that earns an A.
Whenever new high-quality evidence is published. We monitor PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major journals for new peptide studies. When a new RCT or systematic review materially changes the evidence base, we re-grade the page.
No. Peptigrade publishes evidence summaries for educational purposes. Nothing on this site recommends that any specific person take any specific peptide. Consult a licensed medical professional before making any health decision.
§ 07.00
MEMBERSHIP
The letter grade is always free. Members fund the deep research breakdowns, the comparison tools, and the editorial independence.
The grade tier. Enough to get an honest answer fast.
Full evidence breakdowns, the research feed, and comparison tools.
For clinicians and researchers — protocols, handouts, CEUs.
Site licenses for medical schools, libraries, and clinics.
Authenticated access for your whole institution. Volume pricing. EZproxy and Shibboleth supported.